• 45 Posts
  • 1.32K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 12th, 2024

help-circle



  • I’ve read the giving tree recently and i must say, it kinda makes me angry, but not so much because of its sad story, but because i think that that is not a good way of life. you can’t give away your life, i think, and you shouldn’t look at yourself like a candle that is pre-destined to burn down through its course.

    i believe that to truly live well, one must always live as if one had a very long life and must be sustainable in any action. this includes not giving away parts of your life that don’t regrow. that is why the giving tree made me so angry.



  • My dad gets legitimately angry when I do this

    I think it has to do with “putting the waiters out of their job”. Like, when you do a part of the job for them consistently, the restaurant manager will eventually notice that and realize they can do with a little bit less staff. So they hire fewer waiters, which means potential waiters face a tougher job market.

    And for anybody saying “that little bit of support can’t make the difference between more and less staff”, yes, it can. Consider that a restaurant manager might have already decided to fire a waiter that’s a bit less performant (because they struggle to keep up) but decided to keep them anyways, just in case. Now they see that people do a part of the work, and that might just give them the idea that maybe, they could do with fewer waiters, and there’s that one lazy guy who can’t keep up anyway …


  • My test for people is dressing plainly, by which i mean, not excessively well. I wear simple and plain clothing and have a plain appearance.

    In my opinion, jewelry and cosmetics and all that are all very problematic. The whole feminism movement is largely about the fact that women don’t want to be objectified, but then they objectify themselves, i argue. By wearing makeup, you’re making yourself a “pretty thing”, one whose superficial appearance is judged, which is arguably more problematic than helpful. Like, if you’re a woman and talking to a man and you’re overly pretty, you subconsciously think that they only talk to you because you look pretty, and that makes you suspicious of them and a little bit angry, which hinders the discussion and makes honest exchange of opinions a bit more difficult. If you dress plainly, don’t wear makeup, earrings or any of that, then you can’t think that they’re only interested in your superficial appearance that they’re interested in, so that means they talk to you because of your personality, which i think puts you in a better mood and makes the talking more worth-while. It leads to higher-quality exchanges.






  • It’s worth noticing that this is apparently the traditional far-eastern way of life; at least it was explained to me that this “realization” is a major part in traditional japanese meditation techniques.

    It’s also noteworthy that japanese people typically refer to themselves by their name, i.e. I would say “gandalf ate noodles yesterday” instead of “I ate noodles yesterday”. I believe this stems from the idea that you look at yourself from the outside, just like you would look at anybody else. This is also the root cause for why there’s traditionally such a strong “group think” in far-eastern countries. Because they differentiate way less between themselves and others, and often apply the “group perspective” to things, instead of the “individual perspective”.






  • the gold market wasn’t “manipulated”, that was just a lie that Nixon came up with to justify ending the dollar-gold exchange system.

    actually the US government just wanted to have complete control over the dollar, including the ability to print more dollars if needed. if the dollar is bound to gold, that’s impossible because you can’t just print gold. by declaring an emergency (“to protect the dollars against the speculators”) they had enough reason in the eyes of the population to make the dollar a pure fiat currency.


  • And to follow up on my own comment, imagine this:

    • Extracting water from the martian landscape would literally be seen as a source of wealth, and it gives people a strong incentive to extract as much water from the landscape as is reasonably doable, thus giving society a steady source of water, which drives society forward.
    • Maybe, 1 martian dollar ($1) would represent 1 ton of water, and 1 cent (or “bit”) would represent 1 kg of water, which means 1000 cents/bits = 1 dollar.
    • So you might have paper money representing 5c (almost a gallon) or 50c (let’s call it a barrel) for everyday use, so when you go to a market to buy some food, you might pay for it either by paper money or by literally handing over water bottles.
    • The paper money would have to be handed out by banks that store the water or at least are able to hand it out if somebody wants to redeem their paper money.


  • You’ll need some kind of representational currency

    yep that’s exactly what i think would make sense in the real world. basically a paper currency backed by real water. one dollar represents 1 kg of water.

    it’s like the gold standard, just not backed by gold but by water.

    in the game that doesn’t matter though since you can just carry around a lot of water bottles before your inventory space runs out.