

I’m reminded of this
The original book is just the name ‘Doug’ over and over, but the scammers looking at the best-selling books don’t know that lol It’s so fucking weird
I’m reminded of this
The original book is just the name ‘Doug’ over and over, but the scammers looking at the best-selling books don’t know that lol It’s so fucking weird
Being able to frankenstein together images from descriptions…? These things are fun to experiment with, it’s just everything surrounding it (the data theft, data centers, economy, companies pushing it, etc) that has made ““AI”” uncool, a lot of people misunderstanding what it actually is. It could have just stayed pretty neat, I guess
The thing that offputs me most is companies trying to humanize diffusion models and LLMs. Sorry but your graphics cards can’t actually read
I hate the humanizing of AI. My brother in christ you just appointed a pile of graphics cards
Yes, I would do better. I would take a look at the pictures, and think about the angles / geometry, the reason of differences between the pictures, and being able to count sure helps. If they were to show me pictures in a vastly different style, I would make assumptions, like it is a different representation of the same concept. I would not just mash them together based on color values.
I get what you’re coming from, but the only reason these models seem to be able to get stuff done, is the insane amount of training data and iterations.
Enjoying this discussion, by the way! It’s fun to think about.
We can actually look at a hand, and understand it, logically thinking about the composition and style to work with. AI can only copy paste the difference of pixels’ colors on digital images whose metadata happens to contains the word ‘hand’. No matter how many ‘examples’ have been scraped, it can’t actually interpret them the same way we do.
It’s also important to remember these models are trained by sampling (imitating aspects of) images they don’t have the rights to use directly. I think it’s justified being angry about someone using your work -insignificantly mashed together with millions of other people’s work- without your permission, even if it’s to extend a background by 10 pixels lol
Mrrrp meow :3
Prism launcher! Has a cat button too
My wifi does not work out of the box with the windows installer, for some reason, so I have to use my phone as a hotspot. Never happened on the linux distros I tried :>
Hopefully it’ll be recycled into something less gormless
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t the chance of it correllating “bazzite” with anything other than the OS non-zero, because of the random nature of AI?
Is it a lower chance here because it “autocompletes” the phrase and the last bunch of words are more closely related to operating systems?
I’m genuinely just curious about this, I don’t have anything to add really.
That’s the beauty of the gaycation
A similar type of machine learning (neural networks, transformer model type thing), but I assume one is built and trained explicitly on medical records instead of scraping the internet for whatever. Correct me if I am wrong!
The recipe thing is so funny to me, they try to be all unique with their recipes “made by AI”, but in reality it’s based on a slab of text that resembles the least unique recipe on the internet lol
You can! It’ll just suck because LLMs can’t creatively work around system limitations, only spit out resemblances what’s been done before. And game developers do so much more than just coding/writing!
There are libraries and tools that allow people to develop software for older systems (with documentations and examples actually written to be read and understood, unlike slop) and it’s super cool! Raylib supports the N64 and Dreamcast, that gameboy studio thing has gotten quite popular, and there’s fantasy consoles for people who enjoy intentionally working with system limitations.