The Electron framework is open source as much as we hate on it so probably physics

He did cover it up. Nevertheless, he absolutely has a lot to answer for in terms of his “service” to the US military (including torture camps) and then joining Blackwater, as well as obviously his assertion that he didn’t know what it was for 18 years

The first principles:

Incidentally, this is also the only thing most people know about what topology even is

Funny federated comment:

And so Peter Navarro (remember him?) got hold of the monkey’s paw, and he said, “I wish we didn’t have a trade deficit with China,” and then the finger curled over.

I initially misread the title as “How can you hate capitalism when socialism made your iPhone??” which is arguably more accurate

You might be interested in the comments on .ml: https://lemmy.ml/post/37681719

We can use insults that aren’t misogynist to make that point

No one on this site should ever stop posting.

The reason for this is that posting on Hexbear is the second most important thing in all of existence

Allows AI companies to “accidentally” “hallucinate” all of your data perfectly intact

The appeal is probably to people who think AI needs to be integrated into everything just for the sake of it

The image actually says this

I think your comment there might have crossed the line into ableism

I knew that telling you that I don’t want any aid for Israel wouldn’t stop you from trying to convince me.

I don’t care if you’re convinced, but I would like to know if this is because you think what is happening there is some degree of morally unacceptable, or if you just think the money would be better spent at home.

Edit:

You don’t have to respond to this but this is for the benefit of others reading.

I agree that the distinction between defensive and offensive aid is little more than a rhetorical trick, but that’s a long ways from being a “genocide apologist”. To my knowledge, she does not deny that Israel is committing a genocide, and she does not pretend that it’s justified.

In AOC’s case, you have claimed she believes it is a genocide. If she does in fact believe it is a genocide, then she is providing material support (money and weapons), directly to what she believes is a genocide. She is a member of Congress and could use that position to passively sit by with an ineffective protest no vote or even voting present/abstaining in every instance (although you could still argue someone like this should at least be doing more personally, in the end, policies are what matter for elected officials), to what she believes is an actual genocide. Thus, “genocide supporter” logically follows.

If she does not believe it is a genocide, but she thinks it is morally problematic, then while perhaps the label “genocide supporter” could be put into slight contention (those that read Israeli officials’ own statements such as this one 2 months ago on the matter would probably ask how AOC came to another conclusion), it is still in turn problematic that she would materially support something that she believes is morally problematic, and you should find this unacceptable.

If on the other hand, she does not find anything morally problematic there at all, but you think it is at minimum morally unacceptable, then isn’t that a legitimate criticism of an elected official who is supposed to represent her constituents to say that you think they are supporting something that you find to be morally unacceptable?

I know you can’t see this comment but maybe someone else will find it useful

Just like how a siren changes pitch when it’s coming from a vehicle passing by due to the Doppler effect, the same thing happens to moving light sources due to relativistic effects.

Usually astronomical objects are redshifting because the universe is expanding and are thus receding away from Earth’s frame of reference. Most of them are forever unreachable even if we could travel at the speed of light.

Something blueshifting means it’s coming closer from Earth’s frame of reference. In some cases, this could result in the galaxy colliding with ours, such as the hypothesized collision between the Andromeda Galaxy and the Milky Way

Here’s a post from that time period about it if you want to go down the rabbit hole: https://hexbear.net/post/281580

Since you’re a newer account, you might not be aware, but lemmy.world “preemptively” defederated from Hexbear before Hexbear even turned federation on.

“no matter what entrance you chose”

Defederation enters the chat

Further info: https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/09/1165835

In regards to the countries that voted against, this was the “defense” of its position the Zionist entity offered before the vote:

Speaking ahead of the vote, Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon said that “this one-sided Declaration will not be remembered as a step toward peace, only as another hollow gesture that weakens this Assembly’s credibility.”

He said that “Hamas is the biggest winner of any endorsement here today” and will declare it “the fruit of 7 October”.

imagine calling doing the same thing to people

In the this case, they don’t consider them people. The reaction would be entirely different if you were to suggest that someone like Charlie Kirk was “euthanized”