Azerbaijan is NOT part of NATO. They are part of NATO’s partnership for peace, like 18 other non-NATO countries (such as Austria, Switzerland etc), but that is not the same as membership.

But yes they are hardly a democracy even though they call themselves as such and the entire region is a hotbed of strategic interests of different countries first and foremost of Russia and Iran

DPA is the German press association, they sell their news to all interested news outlets. They rarely make mistakes and I doubt they wouldn’t have one for this.

Plus they love the general authotariansim and hope that Russia might bring the same to their countries. Often the nazi parties are also just paid for by Russia (and have ties to Chinese agencies)

o7

Considering the fact that there are over 30 countries that have a civil code derived from the German one, I assume it’s not just one country.

Besides you used health insurance in the USA as the only basis for your argument.

Yeah, honestly that’s just untruthful. Any collision in a modern car needs an entire new front, because of damages to the fragile pedestrian safety systems and the electronics. A new bumper on a 2017 VW is around 1500 Euros painted. Another 1500 for the head lights, the labour cost is obviously country dependent. But even a small accident in a parking lot has damages almost 5 figure high when two modern cars are involved.

When you get into a really bad accident on a highway and dozens of vehicles get damaged, the road is damaged, the cargo of trucks gets damaged etc, you can easily get into the millions if vehicles get totaled or the cargo is expensive. And you car insurance also covers damages to the passengers. If you cripple a child for example, that is at least 10 million in damages, for the pain, the lack of a normal life, the renovation of the hoise of the parents as well as the car, etc.

Damages can become extrodiarinally high, so high in fact that you’re better of killing someone im Germany (by accident) than to just cripple them as that is much much more expensive.

Health insurance in the USA maybe and a couple of other insurances may seem that way. However your private saving can only be so much. Get into an accident in your car - the 10 million in damages is paid by the insurance. Your car is broken afterwards and you manage to cause an accident on your bicycle- the damages is covered by your normal damage insurance. You are injured - the costs are not covered by your insurance. Hence you sue the insurance - your legal insurance covers the six-figure legal fees.

Now I could spin that further without deviating much from reality - even in Europe. Yes technically you’re better of saving the money instead of spending it on insurance - that however is a gamble on your bad luck. Great if it works out - there’s likely no way you could ever save enough to cover all eventualities

Dude just wait for Germany to fuck it over, some of us are just salivating at the thought. It makes me so sick

Not quite correct. The theories are written on a diesel-exhaust pipe.

Die Luftwaffe hat es letztens auch verwendet. Hab daraufhin der Pressestelle geschrieben, ob das vielleicht nicht etwas unklug ist - gab keine Antwort

Aber die ganz schlimme Wirkung, dass die AfD da Zugriff hat wird nicht bis dahin passieren. Und nach dem Urteil müsste das auch wieder gelöscht werden

Das bei dem Namen noch niemand auf die Barrikaden gegangen ist 🤔

Selbst wenn der Bundestag das absegnen sollte, und Steinmeier komplett verschläft, das hier ist ein Selbstläufer beim BVerfG.

Ah yes the comment was about the USSR, the picture was about China, that’s why I got confused. Though that now props the question whether they deliberately ignored the fact that the territory of the USSR grew past its 1930s borders in the aftermath of the war or not.

Also the “entire might of capitalism”? The USSR might have been fighting the entire might of fascism but got quite substantial help from a large part of the capitalist might

Dieser Kommentar ist übrigens von der Kunstfreiheit gedeckt.

Nein, das wäre er nicht, der Schutzbereich wäre bereits nicht eröffnet. Das würde “nur” unter Meinungsfreiheit fallen

Which “most devastating invasion” are they even speaking about? WW2 showed no significant growth of china’s economy.

This would be a case a law student would be able to win you in Germany, not that companies here don’t try it here anyway.

Dafür müsste die Sache bis vor den BGH gehen und der Herr gegen das letztinstanzliche Urteil Urteilsverfassungsbeschwerde erheben. Ansonsten sehe ich keinen Weg, wie die Auslegung der Bibel Gegenstand einer Vereinbarkeitsüberprüfung werden kann, jedenfalls nicht als konkrete Normenkontrolle durch ein Gericht, da diese nur die Vereinbarkeit von Gesetzen zur Grundlage hat.

Nebenbei ist es verfassungswidrig, das Wort hat nichts mit wieder wie in erneut oder nochmal zu tun.

Wobei ich ohne genaueres zu wissen, davon ausgehe, dass hier eher ein Fall des § 96 I StGB vorliegt

Zerstörung von Frauenrechten entwickelt sich langsam zu dem gleichen Strohmannargument wie Kinderschutz