• teegus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is not a good take. It opens for an implicit expectation from your employer that you should not use your vacation. If you get passed over for promotion because you took out vacation it is not really a choice, is it?

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s not. By requiring people to take leave you ensure leave is available.

        My workplace enforces leave by having limits on how much leave you can accrue, if you exceed the limit you are put on leave.

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You sound like a manager, looking to control how people handle their vacation time. “Workers get punished for taking vacation” and “workers get punished for not taking vacation” are two sides of the same coin. Personally I’m in favor of “workers can do whatever they want with their PTO without fear of repurcussion”.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not about punishment. If time off is optional than it’s a near guarantee that workers will be punished in some way for taking it. At a minimum bosses should have to pay out for unused time off, even though that that will certainly lead to some bosses penalizing those workers.