randomblock1

If this was a poorly drawn Paint illustration it probably wouldn’t have been as funny or recognizable. AI is fast, easy, and good enough. This is just a meme most people will forget about in literally 1 minute, IMO there is nothing wrong with using AI like this

deleted by creator

Given the difference in server CPU/memory/storage/network/scale, I don’t think it’s possible to get any number with confidence. Maybe you could self host, but that wouldn’t be representative of real email servers. Plus different email providers handle emails differently.

And cloud providers probably automatically scale with load, Gmail probably uses more power during work hours than after.

Also SSR is relatively new and email services are ancient, I’d be surprised if any used it. I’m not even sure if it’s a good idea for email.

Plus it would probably vary with how many emails you have in your inbox…

I just don’t think it’s possible to get an actual number.

Networking is remarkably efficient, and so is decoding images, because processors do it so quickly. For more intensive tasks like video, hardware decoders make them efficient. All email is to the client computer is making a request for data, processing that into a list that can be displayed, and displaying it. I’m pretty sure just having the screen on is orders of magnitude more power hungry.

The FDA would probably also like to have a word.

Wow holy shit. So if you get submerged it’s just straight up a death sentence. Just when you think they can’t get worse…

It’s probably easier to get one of those ceramic window breakers and get out that way. I’m pretty sure the rip cords are actually quite hard to pull.

Not only that, but they make a LOT of libraries that make using those sensors WAY easier. Arduino, CircuitPython, and more. And lots of well-written tutorials! They care, and it shows. They don’t deserve these tariffs…

Who could have possibly predicted this. I’m shocked.

deleted by creator

By the time they get feature parity I’ll be dead. Affinity is just plain better right now, and it’s not Adobe.

deleted by creator

Why Sha256? Literally every processor has a crypto accelerator and will easily pass. And datacenter servers have beefy server CPUs. This is only effective against no-JS scrapers.

In your example, if gummy candy wasn’t sold in the US, the exact same thing would’ve happened. It’s more to do with vitamin packaging.