• 0 Posts
  • 63 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 24th, 2024

help-circle


  • It would be the other way around, if at all.

    “First-surface” mirrors where the reflective layer is on the front of the glass are quite fragile, so wouldn’t typically used for residential applications (you’d remove the reflective coating by cleaning it).

    A regular mirror has the reflective surface on the back of the glass (which is then is further coated with a protective paint), leading to the effect you describe.

    I don’t however know enough to say one way or the other whether a surveillance mirror would becessarily be a first-surface mirror.



  • There are two kinds of people who would like a refreshed Steam Deck, in my experience:

    1. People who seem to think it needs to be faster. Since it appears to be crafted to provide suitable performance for the 720p display it has (which I don’t personally think needs to be changed, considering the whole “portable” use case), this seems to just be a “bigger number better” argument and those people should probably go out and buy a Lenovo Legion / ROG Ally / whatever.

    2. People who are otherwise happy, but think it should have a newer, more efficient processor to get longer battery life, and make less heat/noise in the process. There’s a measurable gulf between the current Zen2/RDNA2 CPU and a theoretical modern Zen5/RDNA3.5 (or even RDNA4) model in that regard; it could be tuned to deliver roughly the same performance as the original (or a little more, for the handful of games that tend to miss their performance target slightly) but deliver longer battery life.

    We got a hint at 2) with the OLED model’s CPU using a newer manufacturing process improving thermals and battery life (of course it did also have a bigger battery). I think the number of people willing to pay a bit extra for what could be an even larger improvement in that area is probably more than some would like to admit.

    (I personally fit in that latter category. Considering a full work day including a public transport commute and lunch break, not a whole lot of extra battery could well be the difference between having to carry a charger and not)





  • They did, but I honestly preferred the old version. I swapped recently from a 1ii (21:9) to 1vii (19.5:9).

    I now can’t reliably use the phone one-handed and reach the entire way across the display with my thumb, which feels like a much bigger usability issue. Being unable to reach the top was mitigated by side-of-screen gestures that allowed access to the notification bar without reaching to the top of the display, so it was never actually a problem.

    While I can indeed now reach the top of the screen with my thumb, the phone is wide enough that I can’t firmly hold it while doing so, which really isn’t an improvement if I’m liable to drop the damn thing.

    And to be clear, this is with a very small real-world difference in size. If you look at GSM Arena’s size comparison tool, the actual difference is only 3.1mm (1.9%) shorter, and 2.9mm (4.1%) wider: https://www.gsmarena.com/size-compare-3d.php3?idPhone1=13843&idPhone2=10096

    The other thing I can also no longer do is watch a video and use another app at the same time; previously you could have a full-screen-width 16:9 video at the top of the screen, an app with an actually usable amount of height in the middle and the keyboard at the bottom and interact with everything. There’s just not enough room for all three with the shorter aspect, the video always getting scrolled halfway off the screen when opening the keyboard.

    Curiously, have you actually owned one of the earlier 21:9 models? Because I’ve noticed the absolutely overwhelming majority of “complaints” come from people who’ve never actually tried it, but my experience is you hand someone your (21:9) phone and every time they make a positive comment about it.

    Losing these “unique” features is also the thing that is probable to kill Sony phones for good. Without some point of differentiation they’ll become another “also-ran”, selling devices that are otherwise similar to their competitors but cost more. That isn’t sustainable long term. Just ask LG, HTC, or any other non-Samsung Android manufacturer who’s no longer with us.




  • The facilities team at our office would previously build a C-shaped box out of MDF or plywood to sit a regular, fixed-height desk on top of.

    To be fair they did a nice job, they were sturdy and would have recesses for the desk’s legs to sit in to prevent sideways movement. But the problem then became “what about when those people wanted to sit”, so tall office chairs - that didn’t match the rest of the chairs in the office - had to be bought, undoubtedly at considerable expense.

    The new, all-standing-desks use-it-if-you-want-or-don’t-it-doesn’t-matter-to-us regime seems to just avoid a lot of unnecessary shifting of furniture.


  • It should be a great idea, but I feel like the quantities involved are too vastly different.

    I’m seeing estimates of 300kW/hectare (30MW/km² or 77MW/mile²) for heating glasshouses. With individual datacentres frequently confirming multiple gigawatts, the land area required just doesn’t match up.

    This is not to say it isn’t worth considering, but it would be a rounding error in the datacentre’s heat output before you ran out of space to build more glasshouses.

    There’s a secondary concern of water consumption. You might extend that to ah but what if we could use that to grow the plants too? but the evaporated cooling water out of one of these systems tends to be anything but clean. Maybe that’s a more solvable problem.