The ones who admin the social media accounts, twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc.

Further details… none so far. Emerging situation. Will keep this sub posted.

Not endorsing the statement btw.

Hmm, “Perhimpunan Merdeka” is a bit difficult because “perhimpunan” doesn’t have an exact match in English. It’s commonly translated as “association” but the root word is “gather” or “gathering.” It’s a cognate to “katipunan” in Tagalog. As for “merdeka” it’s more “freedom” or “free.” So “free association” might be more fitting.

“Perserikatan Sosialis” is straightforward, yes.

Nope

Heya! Keep an eye on the insurrections in Indonesia!

Luigi didn’t do it though. He’s being set up by the prosecution.

So sorry, I forgot that adding an image deletes the URL

Ooof my bad

While I didn’t write this, it’s copypasta, it doesn’t seem to be AI-generated. Someone made a list article somewhere about Disco Elysium and then mentioned lawns are fascist, and someone wrote up this copypasta.

While I didn’t write this, it’s copypasta, it doesn’t seem to be AI-generated. Someone made a list article somewhere about Disco Elysium and then mentioned lawns are fascist, and someone wrote up this copypasta.

While I didn’t write this, it’s copypasta, it doesn’t seem to be AI-generated.

From where I copied it from, It seems to be satire.

This is my mistake, sorry about that. I saw the report and I thought it asked me to remove the post and it seemed legitimate, but as you point out, it’s not.

Edit: It has been restored. Sorry for the shortcomings on my part.

Gotta tell you, I didn’t think Greta would meet with the Apoists. I knew she is very cool, but now she’s more left libertarian than I thought.

Come on, Instead of Prisons is like 500 pages long. Just admit you don’t have the patience to read.

Abolition is complex. Simple plans are for fascists who can attract any simpleton with sophistry. The violence of policing and incarceration are both very simple plans for the causes of harm. We address criminalization by abolishing the police and prisons. We address future harms through addressing their root causes. We address present harms through harm reduction. We address harms already done through restorative and transformative justice. None of this is simple, clear, or obvious. The work of abolition is always harder than the status quo.

There’s no one method. A lot of people, however, choose various syndicalist and unionist methods of organizing workers to fight back against the bosses. You’ll get a lot of different answers from different people.

My opposition to nuclear isn’t merely because it is dirty, deadly, and costly but also because it relies on a specific technology of power to implement, a specific technology of power that has always been highly authoritarian. As part of the green movement of my country, we also push for denuclearization precisely because the 300mW nuclear power plant was built without democratic oversight. (Imagine risking non-zero chance of meltdown for a measly 300 mW!) Democratic movements are more likely to oppose nuclear energy, so it’s no wonder countries who are poor in democracy like China, USA, Russia, and France build and maintain nuclear power plants despite the public opposition.

Not only that, but nuclear power fuels the valorization process under the capitalist mode of production. Even if the whole world shifts to nuclear energy, the same technology of power that constructed the nuclear power plants would also go about oppressing people.

Nuclear energy can only operate under a specifically authoritarian technology of power. A free society—whether that be anarchist, communist, or radically democratic—simply cannot use the violence needed to construct a nuclear power plant.

But you probably don’t care about that. For you, this technology of power is probably a desideratum as long as you get your damn iPhones and airconditioning.

Pro-nuke energy is getting more and more indefensible after each disaster. May I remind you that literally nobody knows how to deal with long term storage of nuclear waste. No, dumping them in bunkers is not a long-term solution and never was sustainable.

New developments in nuclear technology like with small modular reactors would produce more nuclear waste than conventional reactors. Not to mention that there isn’t enough uranium in the entire Earth for the whole world to shift to nuclear. It’s dangerous, expensive, and its waste is also dangerous and expensive.

That’s not the point. Only states can deploy nuclear energy. A city or province can’t do it. Only fossil fuels or renewables can guarantee local energy sovereignty. And since fossil fuels are bad, that leaves only renewables.

Obviously fossil fuels are worse asshole. It’s literally in the comment when I mentioned Germany.