Forcing a whole table full of people to deliberately be ignorant and pretend to “discover” things that they already know isn’t fun, it’s tedious
That’s like, your opinion man.
Seriously, that is an opinion yet you write it as a general truth. Please don’t do that. There are tables that enjoy the role-playing aspect more, including “my character wouldn’t know that”. I would know, I’m part of one table like that.
It’s not as clear cut as this, a lot of the studies that suggest this don’t stand up to scrutiny, with for example some having numbers of estimated birds killed by cats over the total estimated bird population. Also the fact that the majority of kills by cats are already weak or sick animals, animals that would die soon either way, and not really affect the total population. The only ones that seem legit and suggest an effect on the population are from small islands.
you could argue semantically
No. There’s nothing to argue there, it’s the definition of OCR.
Also, do you believe that LLMs found a new, novel way of doing OCR? That’s not how they work, LLMs don’t invent, they don’t innovate, they’re simply unable to do that. What they do, when they work correctly, is that they use already known and established techniques and tools. So to quote your top comment in this chain:
Skill issue
Here in North America small-ish bottles will usually contain like 50 pills. Can be 100. Then there are the bigger bottles, like 500 pills in one. All OTC.
You’re reading text from a picture. That is OCR.
That was a good read, thank you!
Well I was wrong, thank you for educating me. That list is a bit disappointing…
Could you show an example? GOG has no DRM, for any game. That’s kind of their thing. I was wrong, there’s a full list.
There isn’t much of the brand that is Canadian anymore, it’s all Chinese owned. So unfortunately I don’t believe that reasonable take is the actual one.
Appreciate the sentiment, but rule 1 of the community states that you should keep the original title when submitting an article, using the body or a comment to put your commentary.
As said by another, no need to offer the service worldwide, no need to be competitive, just need not to give them our data. It will cost a lot yes, but I’d much rather that than giving freely all our data to a fascist government and a kowtowing corporation.
Also nice moving of the goalposts, you first said that the article’s title was deceptive, “because the datacenters are in Canada”. I maintain my claim that this changes absolutely nothing to the story.
What does that change? It’s still property of Microsoft, and they’ve stated quite recently that US law will override any notion of sovereignty or ownership. So the datacenters could be anywhere, the data is, for all intents and purposes, american.
I haven’t seen anyone, even the worst of them, pretend we’re already at AGIs. Granted some of them pretend we’re getting close to AGIs, which is an outrageous lie, but a different one.
The department began to use a computer model in 2018 called “advanced data analytics” to sort cases and help officers make eligibility decisions. It claims the system can speed processing by up to 87 per cent.
87%… Well this is not worrying at all!
A 2018 Chinook user manual released under access to information suggests an officer can use the system to examine up to 1,000 cases at the same time.
Yep, nothing to worry about, definitely.
I just want to add that “Look into it” is never a good argument; either you know of a study that shows this, in which case just link it (you’re the one with the burden of proof here), or don’t comment about imaginary data.
I understood that, and I will continue to point it out, don’t worry about it. But your precision was necessary.
Oh you got me there! Except… Please point where I actually said “we’re more numerous so we must be right”… Adding my voice that I know to be right to others that I also know to be right is not that.
You’re trying so hard to justify using ableist, bigoted slurs. There’s no justification for them, full stop.
Now I’m getting out of this convo as I know it will go nowhere, you’re stuck on your position, maybe viewing an admission of being wrong as weakness or something like that. Or you’re a troll. Either way, blocking you, bye!
Low-hanging fruit, others have tried to educate you yet you still cling to your very wrong belief, I just wanted to add to their voices.
True, that was actually poor wording on my part.
Damn you really think that only your vision is the acceptable one. To the point where your “argument” devolves into insulting those that don’t see it like you do.
Stop it. Get some help.