

Apparently subdomains are inadequate, but after talking with some other people and seeing what you guys have to say, I can understand these requirements. He also created a network map, so we are able to better understand it.
Blog: https://dastanktal.planam.link/
Mostly on Hexbear.
Free Palestine!
Baby Marxist. Feral debater. Will continue to “argue” as long as you give attention.
I return in kind the energy sent to me.
Libs be prepared 😈
Apparently subdomains are inadequate, but after talking with some other people and seeing what you guys have to say, I can understand these requirements. He also created a network map, so we are able to better understand it.
Only an idiot would think this is political.
Next you’ll be telling us that declaring your religion is political.
Yes but most cars with an immobilizer can not be remotely activated unless a specific system is installed which is normally offered as a premium feature. Like if I had a keyless start Ford from 2014 Ford couldn’t remotely shut that car off.
No, there’s a few incredibly cheap cars that do not have these features. Also, I’ll just buy used cars. These features don’t exist in hardly any car before, like, 2015.
Yes, but I don’t have to buy a car with OnStar in it. It seems like every electric car has these OTA features at least in the states. In internal combustion cars that can avoid those features. I’d be more than happy to buy any one of these electric cars if I control the updates and there’s no always on connection.
Man, if all electric cars can do this bullshit, then I think I’m gonna just be stuck with an internal combustion engine no matter how bad they are for the environment.
Ain’t no way I’m gonna get into a vehicle that can be remotely disabled by a jackass.
Wow that feels like an exercise in the absurd
JFC. This is terrifying
It took them long enough, but I suppose better late than never.
Can it be both? Feeling so overwhelmed with the amount of research you have to do that you’re paralyzed with the thought of starting it?
Yet too often, these practices are introduced superficially to boost productivity and performance, rather than used to address the root causes of workplace stress.
Everything in the name of profit.
This brings into question whether these practices can thrive in capitalist systems that prioritize profit over people.
It can’t.
Was this article written by AI? The list at the end is especially suspicious since it has three stats with three bullet points each, which seems like something an AI would do since it’s really obsessed with the rule of three.
Yeah someone will host that for the right price
Do it do it do it do it
“It’s deeply troubling that Kaiser would stray from this principle, and NUHW stands ready to help Kaiser in any way push back on the pressure that led to this decision and end the “pause” on gender-affirming surgeries for patients under 19 right away.”
Insurance companies continue to suck
Yeah but those services tend to care a lot less then the payment processors but the I do see your point.
For instance, it’s not as easy as you think to get a website pulled down, or to get a domain name restricted, mostly because they’re not paid for on a monthly basis, they’re paid for on a yearly basis, and sometimes they even have contracts for multi years.
Different clouds support different things, that’s why sites like Parlour still exist despite the massive amount of animosity the administrators of that site face.
Getting a hold of a global register to get them to do something about a domain name on their register, while possible, is not nearly as easy as getting hold of the payment processor.
It seems to me that if payment processing was made to be less effective by this tactic, they would have to choose less effective tactics that sites could choose to ignore. You’re right that they don’t own the hardware, but for big companies like Valve, it would be a pretty trivial setup for them especially with companies out there like open cloud.
Personally, I think these sites should do a thing with cryptocurrency so that you buy crypto with your card and then use that to buy the games. So that way the payment processor can’t get mad at you.
There are studies recently released that show that the people who are buying houses 20 years ago are the same people buying houses today. It is a zero-sum game because nobody else is able to buy a house, especially not if they’re younger.
Bummer. Will have to go read the links
Hahah pifed wants none of that smoke. Man that’s hilarious
This ain’t reddit, and everyone starts somewhere.