Can cause physical harm

The irony is that they can’t, but their greatest weapon is that the people they fight think they can, and flee without even trying. And this post is making the exact same mistake, while also assuming they’re invincible. The answer to the post is the post. That or pointing to the post and laughing.

Without supporting infantry all you need to do is somehow splash some paint on the lenses of their cameras.

The sad part is that so many people feel this is the only way to become a winning, respected member of their local community.

How would removing both cause a paradox? Removing a guest doesn’t remove their Plus One, so why should removing the guest remove their Minus One?

deleted by creator

Being certified as the winner is not the same as being the winner. There’s nothing contradictory about both claiming Biden was certified and claiming Biden was falsely certified - so this isn’t like the “state’s right to what?” thing, finishing the sentence for them doesn’t change the statement.

“groy” rhymes with “Troy” (or boy or joy) and the “per” is pronounced as a p then an “er” as in “trigger” or “banner”.

So, a groyper is like one who groyps.

Okay, but there’s every reason to think the department investigating this has been purged of anyone not a self-declared Republican. Because as a reminder, that’s a thing that Trump’s regime has explicitly done (or try to do) govt-wide.

In Factorio 2 (yeah sure, Space Age is “just a DLC”, right), the final armor is basically a coffin. The dev diaries explicitly state their intention on it. They also explicitly say that the protagonist is not the ‘good guy’, for that matter.

Huh, the translator is broken.

You might say that unironically if you lived in Iran. MasterCard wants to make all the money.

There’s no reason wizard hats can’t shield the face from bullets. In fact, in the later books there might be a hat that does basically that IIRC.

Besides which, wizard hats have wide brims. And they have scarves.

https://www.andrewalexanderprice.com/blog20131204.php

A Traditional City Primer

To be fair, streetcars were sometimes a grift that weren’t intended to work in the first place. Not all, but some.

See, electric companies pushed for new suburbs to be built with electric streetcars, because if you need to put in all the wiring for a streetcar, you might as well just electrify the entire suburb while you’re at it. Which is what electric companies wanted; the streetcars were just an excuse to get the wiring in. They didn’t actually care if the streetcars made sense or stuck around, as long as the electric wiring stayed put.

So electric companies would happily push for nonsensical streetcar layouts that maximised the number of electrified households, and then someone else would come along and say “this is idiotic, let’s rip it up” (possibly because it’s true, possibly because car/oil $$$) and the electric companies wouldn’t push back, because they didn’t care either way in the first place.

Stalin never even claimed that the USSR had achieved communism, yet somehow every grandma in his “state socialist” empire thinks full communism was reached and the state withered away like Marx predicted. They believe lies he never even told.

He did claim to be communist though - as in, he is ideologically driven to attempt to bring about communism. So calling the USSR “communist” is 100% correct. And naturally, what do you call life under communists? Communism! (This is wrong, but it’s an understandable switch-up).

Since Light doesn’t immediately write his police-chief father’s name in the book. Since light planned to become a cop himself.

In case this is real: you realize that trains already exist, right? Crackheads don’t “steal the copper from the rail”, in part because the rails don’t have copper (they’re made of steel, the copper is in the overhead line), and in part because the rails are giant continuously-welded steel rails nailed to concrete sleepers; you can’t just pick em up and walk off with em.

You’re wrong, you have no evidence. Burden of proof is on you.

The problem is that cheap style-less architecture is often called brutalist architecture, because it sounds more sophisticated than “eh we were too cheap to make it look nice”.

deleted by creator