It was forensics. They used forensics. Ai did not help, probably got a bit in the way even. You can do these things with data. We told you several times

Sorry, I meant after heart disease ofc

Eh what? Is this factual? Cars kill way more at all stages

Aight i can spoiler alert the steps

Step 1 fiddle with the system prompt

When that backfires (that’s what Elon did with grok)

Step 2 put in expensive guardrails

When that fails (latent space is inherently untethered)

Step 3 lie

A topologist does not concern themselves with the shape of the holes, only if they can be filled

No you mean not niche

A topologist does not smile. A topologist wonders why the basic example from his introduction is shoveled into his face for no reason

Nah I just swapped. It’s better here, I like it more.

Ya

It says 31 thousand people used it consistently for three months, then stopped on the same day

That also does not explain this graph

No, it has actually never happened that thirty one thousand users tries an app for 3 months then stopped on the same day. You might reevaluate

Haha i have watched it several times, its ny favorite lol

Still 31k don’t try something if that is true

Am I supposed to recognize the character or his emotion? Cause I don’t get what either are

Because neither of yall actually waited.

Not even long enough for what they meant by wait

Have more important things to do, I wonder?

That is what they use them for. So yes.

That kind of feels like a good idea yeeeah… slowly backs away showing my palms

But it can’t be right that twenty thousand users stop like the same day? It’s gotta be some error

Neat website (xcancel), I love it!

Anyway, this is pretty low effort, but honestly, stupid simple ideas from laymen have historically proven to be pretty awesome every now and then so I won’t dismiss it. Godspeed