It should be added that, “Once a suspect requests a lawyer, police are generally required to stop questioning until an attorney is present. The Supreme Court case Edwards v. Arizona further strengthened this rule, holding that any attempt by law enforcement to continue questioning without an attorney present violates the suspect’s rights.”

Once you ask for a lawyer questioning is ‘suppose’ to stop. If you’re still alone and they keep prying. That’s only more cause for concern.

Best I can do is a microwave and a banana.

Unfortunately, I’ve just come down from the isle of Skye

God. I know it’s the pettiest and least on-topic thing about these photos but… That god-damn weird-ass Trump centaur stance… At all times. Always. Centaur stance. I hope it’s physically painful for him to stand like that. I hope it hurts every day that he has to get up and walk.

No joke. Payment processors absolutely need to be treated as a utility. Stuff like this is exactly why it’s such a big deal to reinstate/protect net-neutrality as well. What we’re watching right now with payment processors isn’t even end-game yet for what they potentially could do, and it already sucks. I can’t even imagine once ISP start doing the same thing. Monopolies are the death of consumer rights. The unabated power, corruption, and corporately bought and controlled laws/ governing bodies makes the entire prospect even worse.

Thank you for this clarification. This is an extremely important context. “Palestine Action” is the particular name of a very specific organization, so the title of the article is obviously a bit misleading.

Still very worrying and more than a bit concerning, though. Here’s to hoping for a future strengthening of UK speech laws. Though, frankly, I’m not so sure about US speech laws anymore. Cheers.