

I am not going to dump a load of bitterness on you. You are not the architect of our problems, but like.
You know some of us hate every minute of this and are powerless targets, right?


I am not going to dump a load of bitterness on you. You are not the architect of our problems, but like.
You know some of us hate every minute of this and are powerless targets, right?


30% of trans people said, “Sorry, the beebeewhat?”


We went on a huge rant about it to partners lately, about how the entire concept of advertising is defection to entities that exist enough to have experiences, an endlessly escalating Red Queen’s race of who can be louder, more memorable, more in your face, BUY BUY BUY BUY BUY BUY BUY BUY BUY
It’s infuriating and depressing by turns, and most of the entities around just brush it off as it gets louder and louder and louder.


Always wild when people seem confused about why you’d want to do this.
BECAUSE THESE ONES LOOKED AT YOUR SCREEN AND THE ARTICLE WAS TWO INCHES OF TEXT BETWEEN FIVE INCH ADVERTISER BARS BRENDA THAT’S WHY


Part of him being charisma incarnate is having exactly zero fucks to give about how his appearance differs from conventional attractiveness.
Part of the incel anticharisma comes from obsessing over how some facet of your appearance means never getting laid.
Turns out just being chill about shit is sexy AF.


She isn’t starting to listen, though.
She just decided that because she half admitted a mistake that lots of people loudly told her she was making, she can just act like none of the nastiness she perpetuated on people who carefully explained why this was going to blow up in her face. She just declared that she was reaccepted, trying to wishcast instead of engaging in personal growth.


Brianna should go home and read, forever.
She was wrong. She remains wrong. The most help she can be to anyone is to butt the fuck out.
The trans movement in no wise needed a quisling to suck up to TERFs, and we aren’t going to coddle her for getting what she was told she would.
This is not a matter of innocent ignorance. This was a matter of willfully ignoring all of the people telling you what would happen, complete with historical record.


Anyone who ever ever done anything I dislike as much as coming closer to me in public than one meter, is exactly as bad as Donald Trump, and I can see no difference between them.
/s, obviously, although clearly where a sane line lies is not globally known.
Pfft, these people are complete Martians. Athena wouldn’t have them. Where’s the metis?


That was me over here.
“They won? Okay, they won. No you don’t need to argue with them that they lost shutupshutupshutupshutup!”


No, just noticed you around. Mentioning the pronunciation of your name in comments caught its attention, because up until it saw you saying something, this one thought it knew how to say “Tanis”, but perhaps it is mistaken.


This one believes it has seen you speak of this in the wild previously and was curious then, and now, as this one as at least passed you more than once, may it ask if there is a reference for entities that are online?

Things are almost always more than one thing.


It all means something.
The first case is when it has limited samples on a particular topic, leaving it with insufficient data - “epistemically uncertain”
The second is when it tries to think about something, but it doesn’t have the ability to hold it in mind, the thought is in some way too large, that’s representational capacity.
The last is just, factoring stupid large numbers, and things of that nature.
We’re not going to read this one deeply, because we’re pretty sure this was demonstrated a while ago. Cool for OAI to catch up with the current state of the field, we guess?


Turns out?
Terrorizing not so hot as a governing method.
Can we try helping everyone instead? Say for like, five generations. That’s not much, we’ve certainly been doing variations of terror for at least that long.


The flip side of this is that it has to be praiseworthy to pass through that gauntlet and still care about other people. Eclusively negative incentives don’t work.


In theory, we know how to build super dense city. In practice, we build gigantic suburban sprawl.
Yeah. There are a lot of people outside of the country who do not even have the limited legal recourse available to me, should I be snatched from the street. For those this administration has harmed both actively and passively outside the borders, there is not even really the opportunity to be one of the few who gets an active effort to pull from their fucked up systems.
Thanks for the nudge away from staring at my own feet.