

Sure buddy, but for me anti genocide protestors of whatever affiliation are welcome, no matter what the pigs label them.
wiki-user: unruffled
“In every State, the government is nothing but a permanent conspiracy on the part of the minority against the majority, which it enslaves and fleeces.”
- Mikhail Bakunin
Queer/trans gender abolitionist | anarchist | piracy enthusiast
Sure buddy, but for me anti genocide protestors of whatever affiliation are welcome, no matter what the pigs label them.
When simply being anti-genocide leads to you being arrested, your government is pro-genocide by definition.
The cat is not what it seems.
IDK why I’m continuing at this point […]
I was wondering the same thing tbh. Ciao.
Exactly this. Xenopronouns are just as valid as any other pronoun. PJ and Philip seem to be mostly ok with “traditional” (lol) trans pronouns like “xir/xe” or “they/them” so they think they are good trans allies. But they are only allies to certain types of “mainstream” trans folks. Because everything has to be mainstream before a Democrat will ever consider supporting it, in my experience. The moment the pronouns get “too weird” they all start freaking out. Xenopronouns? Forget about it! I’ve even seen it argued that xenopronouns are anti-trans (somehow)? Who knows, but it seems there’s a bunch of LW folks who seem to be that its fine to hate on folks who use them.
I stand by my mod actions on SoftestSapphic. Folks can make their own assessment without having to suffer through your opinion.
Where’s the receipts?
Because then they can’t keep playing the victim.
Lol who knew he was such a pugjesus fanboy?
Slopper are assholes who go around hijacking comment threads to tell everyone about what they think of genAI “slop”. So I think you fit the description just fine.
Removed by mod
So if I were to call someone a “fag” that’s not a slur against gay people? In exactly the same way “Schizo” is a slur against folks with schizophrenia. It’s not rocket science. You are using their disorder as an example of something that’s wrong/bad. How do you think that makes folks with schizophrenia feel? You freeze peach idiots are only interested in yourselves.
That’s because you’re an slopper constantly trolling in our comms.
Check out PJs LW modlog, it’s not all rainbows and sunshine. I know you love to do that anyway.
Nobody accused him of “mass downvoting”, that’s a strawman. What he was accused of was harassing one of our users, looking him up for the specific purpose of downvoting past posts/comments and to leave salty comments and reports on old threads like a goddam stalker, because he’s an angry turbolib who blames the left (and Eugene in particular, for some reason) for the pathetic failure of the corporate-c**k-sucking Democrats to defeat Donald Trump. There is plenty of evidence for all of those things.
At the very least, his behaviour around this has been petty and childish, not great qualities in a mod. And if he was even a slightly reasonable person, he probably wouldn’t have quit our instance in a huff, and started up a personal grudge community to stir up pointless drama all because of a 7 day temp ban. Like just how fragile is his ego, anyway? We’ve all copped short bans without going into a full breakdown about it.
And it’s pretty well known by now (except for you it seems) PJ has a bad temper, and that he’s been losing his shit more and more lately. He even states as such in his profile. While I do feel empathy for the fact he lives in chronic pain, that’s no excuse for harassing one of our users in this manner.
I believe that Eugene was sincere in his complaint, and he was very upset by the situation. PJ has all the power in this situation as a “power mod” and very active poster. Eugene is just a random user who was targeted for his political stance. And the fact you are defending PJ here instead of believing the victim is concerning to me. Much like the “believe women” slogan during the #metoo movement, my default position is to believe my upset users, not to side with the person bullying them. That’s just how we roll at dbzer0 and I’m not gonna apologize for it.
I mean, what’s the difference between your position here and something like, “Harvey Weinstein has made lots of great movies and nobody else has complained about him, so that woman must be lying”? There is no difference. PJ is just busy trying to launder his bruised reputation imo, and you are helping him with that project.
Can you describe what you mean by a normie? I’m genuinely curious.
I’m not endorsing the vote manipulation, and in fact we immediately banned all his alts from our instance as you are perhaps aware, but didn’t mention here, and the user has been warned not to do it again.
But it honestly seems a bit pathetic to be crying all over Lemmy just because someone decided to give you a taste of your own medicine for a change tbh. Especially when you and your contumelious mates go around bullying and harassing folks all the time. Don’t you have a shred of self awareness? Your behaviour is 100x more toxic than any genAI image will ever be.
Yeah we dodged a bullet there. Shame it was at the expense of the Americans.
It all looks healthy, not too many slugs and snails in your area I’m guessing. Apparently a saucer of beer is a good low cost way of dealing with them.
If your motivation is reducing human suffering then the two painless deaths are preferable. If your motivation is saving the most lives, then one painful death wins out. It’s a tricky one because if reducing human suffering is your primary objective, it leads to the inevitable conclusion that the best option to reduce human suffering is to never exist in the first place, which isn’t a very humanist conclusion. I think ethically I’d have to go for the one painful death then, but it would be hard to live with. My heart is telling me the two painless deaths would play on my conscience less.