You know that’s literally not what the study says right… ?

Just because you believe something to be true, does not make it true. Its really important you grapple with that fact.

If the origin of homophobia is from fear of the other, why can that not persist as a major cause going forward. Especially as you note people do not, at scale, act rationally.

This is the only bigotry where people try and pin it mostly on the minority who suffer from it.

You would never accuse misogynists of being secret women, or racists of being secretly black.

Its only here where the difference is invisible that you like to deny, diminish and downplay the involvement of the majority in upholding bigotry.

This is a strawman, and not what I claimed at all. Please read my comments more carefully if you wish to understand what I am saying.

The key factor is that it neither answers nor proves the claim. Linking it shows a failure to read even the abstract.

But only gay conservatives according to you.

And the reason they stigmatise queer people is … because they’re conservative.

If you insist that according to logic homophobia comes from queer people in denial, you need to bridge that last gap to avoid circular reasoning.

Where did the stigma come from initially in your little fantasy world?

As noted, its a small sample size, and even in that sample size the homophobic participants exhibited “arousal” to all sexual stimuli.

I don’t think that makes someone gay.

You also have to consider the subset of self described homophobes who would consent to having a device strapped to their genitalia while they are shown gay porn…

They may not be a representative of the larger group.

I hope no one is saying most misogynists are secretly women.

Yeah… statistically speaking… its not true.

Almost like the first one isn’t true either.

Do you see a lot of people criticising cross stitch?

Its a self-selected distinction , not an imposed one.

People describe their own political beliefs, they don’t have a label thrust on them that they must use.

You also didn’t answer either of my questions.

So you clearly have more in common with politicians than you think.

Do you… just reject the idea that some positions are good and aome positions are bad, or do you object to the idea of labelling current existing positions as good or bad?

You can and should care about more than one thing at a time. Don’t let the Epstein files blind you to everything else happening

Depends on how much you like pain.

Well that’s just not true…

Most of that chapter has to do woth “the identity of christ”, not signs and symbols of the rise of Christianity.

I guess a pill could be a vaccine, but this drug is neither a vaccine nor a pill, so I have no clue why youre bringing this up.

Id hope the fact that none of it is true also turns people away from churches.

You don’t need to convince everyone, just enough people.

Were already seeing really good progress with pills and condoms, so an option which doesn’t need to be taken on a strict daily schedule will be a huge boon.

So, what got misinterpreted to turn “Herod’s temple will be destroyed” into

“Truly I tell you, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.” ?