• pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It is implied in the post.

      It’s pretty asinine to suggest that ‘photographic inkjet paper is just paper’. You pick up a plain stack of A4 and try ask a store clerk ‘is this photographic paper?’ and they’ll say ‘no, the photographic inkjet paper is here’ and point you to the gloss photo paper.

      You can have plain A4 paper that’s marketed as ‘photographic quality’ - but that ain’t photographic paper, which is what the post says.

      • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Right? There’s no critical thinking that should be involved here, the OP had no segue, you would have to be deliberately obtuse to think it was about something else.

        People just don’t like looking stupid, so that’s all the downvotes in this chain, or again, people being deliberately obtuse to troll. Weird how only one persons comments got removed, mods suck, leave the trolls…