• porksnort@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I got to peek inside the decommissioned SL1 building where a fatal reactor incident happened. They still scoop up bits of fuel from ant mounds in the vicinity because the fuel pellets happen to be the size of particles ants prefer in their mounds. Did a few seasons of ecological surveys on the INL and it is a wacky place.

        • porksnort@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          49 minutes ago

          The INL itself is still an active nuclear research facility. The SL-1 building is just a big sheet metal shed, mostly empty now and far away from any current activity, except sheep grazing.

          INL was founded as a peacetime ’sister’ to Hanford, where weapons-grade material is made. For instance, there is a surgical suite with an active reactor for boron-neutron capture therapy of certain cancers. In one form of that therapy, they remove the top of the skull and expose the brain directly to the neutron source.

          Yeah, it’s a wild place.

    • TehBamski@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      …I really don’t know what to do with this information.

      Idaho! That’s where the first 3 people died from a nuke explosion!

      https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/ebri-reactor-meltdown-1955-nuclear-power

      The article that you linked doesn’t even speak of there being a “nuke explosion” nor deaths, injuries, casualties, etc., etc.

      Are you implying that modern nuclear reactors are unsafe? Or perhaps, how far we’ve come with nuclear reactor procedures, technologies and safety messures, from back in Or perhaps, you’re sharing a tidbit and an article that relates only in the fact that they both happened in Idaho. Or perhaps, you’re trying to stir up trouble.