LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square701linkfedilinkarrow-up1814arrow-down179
arrow-up1735arrow-down1imageI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square701linkfedilink
minus-squareTheRedSpade@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 month agoHow can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
minus-squareVoroxpete@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·30 days agoThey didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case. But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·13 days ago so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case No, but it can be and is a coefficient of the Term 5(8-5)
How can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
They didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case.
But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.
No, but it can be and is a coefficient of the Term 5(8-5)