I too like Tempo, but I use Navidrome as the backend.

Those always smell nice, but are far too sweet for my tastes.

I didn’t realize frangelico was a hazelnut flavor. I don’t think I’ve ever tried it. Liqueur is usually fairly sweet and I really prefer my coffee entirely unsweetened. Thanks for the suggestion though.

I’ve tried it and its OK, but I prefer something that’s unsweetened. I like my coffee black, but sometimes nutty.

I’ve really enjoyed my Bazzite experience. I’ve been running Linux for decades though, so take it with a grain of salt.

I mean, self hosting is basically gardening for computers.

Those work pretty well these days

What’s it got that Ptyxis doesn’t?

Every time I use Powershell it makes me love bash even more

I’ve not used i2p but I’ve had to mess with a lot of other random weird tools under bazzite. I’d suggest installing it in a distrobox. There is a command for linking programs from your host into the distrobox and then exposing them back to the host. I forget the exact syntax but I used it for vscode and intellij and it was really straight forward and worked well. I don’t see why it wouldn’t work with i2p and Firefox.

Looks neat, but Navidrome+Tempo have been working great for me.

Great points, but I’m on the opposite side while being in a similar user group. I never used Arch, but I used Gentoo for a few years and did LFS a couple times. Now I’m using Aurora/Bazzite on my workstations. I hack around on my machines a lot but sometimes I just like stuff that works too. When I need to get some development done, I don’t want to run into the weird bit of configuration left over from some previous project. I like that it pushes users towards encapsulation mechanisms like flatpaks and devcontainers. It keeps the core cleaner and more stable. The tradeoffs of having to bake extra packages into a container somewhere usually aren’t too bad.

Those are dope slippers

I recently setup Music Assistant and have been trying to make it work in my VLANs with my esp32 devices. It has been slow going. Nothing has the level of logging required to easily debug the issues I’ve encountered but I’m slowly working through it all.

How’s your experience with meshtastic been? I’ve just started experimenting with it. There are very few nodes in my area, so my potential use cases seem limited.

Homepage is great, especially if the services are deployed on docker or Kubernetes. You can just add some metadata to each service and Homepage will automatically pick them up. No need to remember to update it directly for a new service.

I got a Venstar T2000. Its at a decent price point, HAOS has built in support for it, and it can work entirely without internet.

Long time Blood Angel player here. I would NEVER suggest that army as a starting point. There’s no jump packs at all and very little synergy between the units. Assault Ints are decent for going after objectives, but there are much better options for that role. And Bolter DC are the least popular DC unit by far. The list is a joke.

You’d get much better mileage from Mephy, 2x Jump Assault Intercessor squads, 2 squads of Jump DC, Astorath, and maybe Lemartes. Round it out with a Ballistus or a Baal Predator and your opponent will know what facing Blood Angels feels like.

Kubernetes is great if you run lots of services and/or already use kubernetes at work. I use it all the time and I’ve learned a lot on my personal cluster that I’ve taken to work to improve their systems. If you’re used to managing infra already then it’s not that much more work, and it’s great to be able to shutdown a server for maintenance and not have to worry about more than a brief blip on your home services.