Have strong opinions, but welcome all civil discussions.

Mastodon: @[email protected]

  • 9.04K Posts
  • 987 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle




















  • Full quote

    Carr said that Congress temporarily authorized the hotspot program during the pandemic, and the FCC didn’t have authority to bring it back when the congressional authorization expired.

    Gomez disputed Carr’s legal argument, saying that “Congress gave the FCC permission to expand the applications of E-Rate funding as the technologies used to educate children evolve.” She pointed out that the Universal Service law says the FCC may designate additional services for support. Gomez continued:

    When the E-Rate program was implemented, dial-up Internet was the standard, and today, September 30th, 2025, AOL is discontinuing dial-up service. It is safe to say the landscape of communications technology has changed dramatically throughout the life of the E-Rate program. As underscored during my visit to the High School for Environmental Studies in New York a couple of weeks ago, students are now using Chromebooks in classrooms on a regular basis, and they are expected to submit homework assignments online using platforms like Google classroom. These changes are made possible with support from E-Rate funding.

    Yet George W. Bush did that for bookmobiles so we know Carr is full of shit.






  • AI Overviews is content taken from existing sites, AI Mode is content generate entirely by an LLM model (which article in this post talks about). PolitiFact in reference to Google talks about autofill search feature which predates “AI” since it was released in 2004.

    If you want people to take your aguments seriously, don’t mistort the facts to get your point across. Maybe Google fucked with their search algorithm or modified the weights to prefer some sources over others in the AI Overviews, but they couldn’t fuck with AI Mode since it didn’t exist then.


  • Privacy issues could be mitigated and to the specific “issue” of children and teenagers accessing adult content basic parenting and conversation would have a bigger impact than trying to forbid it. How has that worked out historically with alcohol or smoking?

    By UKs definitions in OSA once considered family shows like Dancing with the Stars and other entertainment productions could be banned. Sexualized content is everywhere in real life, internet just mirrors it, not creates it.

    The fundamental issue with age verification is censorship. Once framework is created it can be applied to any other content someone deems you shouldn’t access. What is legal today can be illegal tomorrow.